Tag: children

The Joy of Hobbies

“My father comes from this classic English amateur tradition, where you should do lots of things and none of them well.”

This came from Malcolm Gladwell in conversation with Robert Krulwich on the excellent Radiolab. It’s not one of Gladwell’s more famous quotes, but it is among my favourites because it resonates with me very strongly. Although it’s not my father I’m thinking about in reference to this quote, but me.

I love hobbies, and I have had many. I find lots of things fascinating, and enjoyable, and so I find myself taking short, deep dives into many different topics and pastimes.

Currently I am flying power kites, working on a kit car, and (though this is notionally a business it currently lacks the revenue to justify that grouping) looking to launch an atheist T-shirt brand. I am working my way through the collected essays of Richard Dawkins, and the complete history of 90s sci-fi series Dark Angel. This is all alongside my more long-term hobbies: the usual fiction, films and music, snowboarding, cooking, gadgets and general geekery, and DIY.

In each of these things I acquire knowledge and skills to a greater or lesser standard, but I will never be truly expert at any of them. That, as Gladwell has asserted in his book Outliers, would take 10,000 hours practice or study.

But do I need to be expert to enjoy these things? Not at all. There’s a huge amount of reward to be had from achieving even basic competence or understanding. If it matters to you (and I concede that it probably does to me) just having that basic level of competence sets you apart from 99% of the rest of the population. More importantly, it gives you a connection with each member of the 1% who do have those things as their primary hobby or focus.

I’m hoping that my kids share my desire to learn about lots of different areas. I’m looking forward to taking them horse-riding, ice skating, clay pigeon shooting, fishing (if my vegetarian wife will let me), to galleries and museums, libraries and workshops. Better that than pushing them to excel in a single discipline (unless they want to).

After all, most of us will eventually spend at least 10,000 hours becoming expert in something: work. If you are over the age of 25, chances are you have already invested 10,000 hours in developing your career skills and knowledge. Unfortunately the working day for most of us is so varied that it takes much longer than that before we can nail a single specific skill to expert level.

But at 32, I’m pleased to say I’m pretty confident in one or two aspects of my typical working day. And that is quite enough expertise for me.

Killer Kids: Do Games Make Children Violent?

Popped in to the Beeb this morning for another little comment spot on violent computer games. This was all spurred by the launch of the FPS Vest, a new peripheral that looks like a flak jacket and replicates the feeling of being shot for players of first person shooter games. They wanted to know if this accessory was a step too far.

There’s no proven link between violence in games, films, books or music and violence in real life. There will always be a tiny minority of people who are already unstable and are affected by such things, but legislating for that minority would quickly limit the scope of any creative endeavour.

The accusation that violence in games desensitises people, and particularly children, is the most commonly wheeled out when the tabloids decide that ‘Something Must Be Done’. But however engaging games may become, particularly with the addition of accessories like the FPS vest, there are very few people who won’t recognise a massive difference between wielding a mouse and wielding a real weapon. The visceral reality of real-life violence is hard to replicate in any medium.

But despite this I do think that age controls on games – and their enforcement by parents – are important. For a start there is the simple preservation of innocence. People have plenty of time in life to experience some of the darker plots and themes explored in fiction of all forms. It becomes progressively less socially acceptable for people – particularly boys – to engage in the softer side of fiction and fantasy as they get older. In my opinion, the longer they can hold on to innocent dreams, the better.

There’s also the issue of learning rules and boundaries. Although I think children of even a very young age can differentiate between fantasy and reality (my wife’s godson loves Ben 10 but doesn’t expect to be able to transform in to a monster), there’s no need to taint their learning with violent games before the boundaries of acceptable behaviour have been established in their heads. An age limit at least increases the chance that they will have been taught right and wrong sufficiently well before exploring those boundaries in fantasy. (Any child psychologists reading, I’d appreciate your views.)

Finally there is the simple issue of sleeping at night. I am a grown bloke and I find games lake Doom 3 genuinely terrifying. OK I’m a softy who doesn’t watch horror movies, but the terror of giant demonic monsters leaping out of the shadows is enough to give anyone bad dreams. Replace the monster with more realistic violence in a modern day setting, and the impact is potentially greater.

The FPS Vest is going to be controversial whether sold in black or pink (yes, they do it in pink, ‘for girls’ I am assuming). And the idea of it may be a little unpalatable for some. But it really doesn’t change the age-old habit of playing war games, whether that be by kids in the playground with fingers for guns; or by adults with paintball guns running around in the woods.

(Thanks to Eamonn and Diane for having me on. Thanks particularly to Diane for the complement on my suit, from Long, Berry, and Wild, a fantastic local tailors who I can’t recommend highly enough. Less thanks go to Eamonn to baulking at my suggestion that I was in my late twenties. I am, still, just about…)

“Something Must Be Done!” – Panorama goes all Daily Mail

I haven’t yet seen last night’s Panorama, but by all accounts it was a fairly shocking affair. Who needs the Daily Mail to scaremonger, when the widely trusted and impartial BBC can do it better?

Science degrees may not be cool, but at least if we had a few more geeks in the media we could get away from this nonsensical approach to news. “Electromagnetic radiation? Oooh, sounds scary. Best do an expose on it.”

Only this morning I read a story about a campaign by ‘families’ to get at least one of the three mobile phone masts ‘near’ their houses moved. Try telling them that the radiation from their phone is many times what they will receive from the mast, or that the further they are from the mast, the more radiation it will emit. They won’t listen. Of course they don’t want to hear that – that would mean giving up their mobile phone. Much easier to believe that the big scary mast is the problem, rather than their cute little handset.

Before crying ‘something must be done’, people really ought to do a little reading.

(Read more responses on BadScience.net, here)