Tag: environment

If you’re claiming a conspiracy, chances are you’re on the wrong side of the debate

I’m a little bit depressed. While reading up on climate change, I disappeared down one of those rabbit holes that occasionally open up beneath you when browsing the web. What I found at the bottom was a bunch of mad hatters, gleefully tea-partying while the world burns.

It all started with a few conversations with climate sceptics. Not the rabid trolls that inhabit internet forums, but real sensible people who have been swayed by contrarians in the media. Such is the liberal media’s desire for balance, and the rest’s desire for conspiracy theories, that what seems to me and 99% of the world’s scientists to be the clear truth about our changing climate has been obscured.

The result is that even the rational are confused. Unless they have taken a determined interest in climate science, most people in the UK seem to have been convinced that there is genuine doubt as to the veracity of the man made global warming hypothesis.

I say hypothesis because we can’t objectively and conclusively prove that the current changing climate is down to man’s activities – as always with science we are reliant on the available evidence fitting the best theory we have. There is always doubt.

As a marketer and an atheist, I know the sad truth that it is much easier to sell certainty than doubt – even if that doubt is just a tenth of a percent, versus an overwhelming percentage of positive evidence.

So I have to rely on the sensible out there to apply a little thought to understanding the issues and the evidence before coming to a conclusion. And I have to ask that they make the time for this enquiry, because it is important, and because it seems unlikely that the media is going to do the job for them any time soon. They are either too interested in balance to say what they believe (respectable) or too heavily indebted to other interests to report honestly the balance of evidence (not so respectable).

I’m no enviro-angel: like most people I am trying to make small changes in my lifestyle while still having a lifestyle that I and my family can appreciate and enjoy. I’m not asking everyone to give up their cars, cows and consumables tomorrow. But if governments and businesses are going to start making the changes we need in order to minimise the climate crisis, they need to know that the weight of educated public opinion is with them. And today, that simply isn’t the case.

If you don’t have the will or the time for your own enquiry, then I ask you this one simple question: do you really want to side with those who claim that tens of thousands of scientists have concocted a 150 year conspiracy in order to boost their own research funding and support some marginal increases in fuel duty?

If you’re going to be sceptical about anything to do with the climate, that’s the theory I’d start with.

Eco-Mechanics: a return to products built to last

Built-in obsolescence is the design of objects for a specific lifespan. The idea is that when one object fails, you’ll buy another one. It is a very wasteful business model, especially when the things being designed could last so much longer.

Take cars for example. Modern cars are made from many materials with a limited lifespan, and designed with fixings that aren’t meant to be repaired or replaced. Just look at the faded and cracked bumpers hanging off many cars just a few years old. Beyond a certain point, maintaining them becomes uneconomical for all but the keenest enthusiast or expert mechanic.

This seems mad to me, especially in the current climate – both environmental and economic. We are a world in need of solutions to the mounting carbon problem, and looking for ways to spend less. With these factors in mind the retail model of the car industry looks increasingly flawed.

Why not make cars that are designed to last us twice or three times as long and change the business model from one of regular retail sales to one of lifetime maintenance?

Of course this would require cultural changes too. But if cars were designed to be upgraded with new safety and comfort features over time, the opportunities for customisation and personalisation could be enormously attractive to consumers.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Car lover not planet hater

I love cars. I love their complexity, their style, their power and their function. I was lucky enough to have a car from a young age: while I was still learning to drive my parents very kindly bought me a slightly dilapidated 1970 Volkswagen Beetle, which I proceeded to clean up and respray (following the application of copious quantities of filler), and fit with a series of ever-more Heath Robinson-esque stereo arrangements.

This fabulous transport became the group taxi for my friends for the next few years, and took me down to Cardiff and up to Manchester, as well as on more prosaic lunchtime trips to the nearest drivethru McDonalds. I think the fact that it also allowed me to ferry my younger sister from place to place encouraged my parents’ generosity, but I was no less grateful for that. It was an incredible thing to have that degree of freedom at such a young age.

I’m not sure I truly appreciated the freedom a car brings until a few years later. After University I went without a car for a few years, following the sad, quiet collapse of the Beetle’s engine/bodywork/chassis/suspension, and the passing on of my next car, a hand-me-down Metro Mayfair that had belonged to my Grandma. While I didn’t have a car I coped fine, getting the train to work and everywhere else. But after working for a few years I decided I wanted a car again – as much, I confess, out of sheer consumerism as a real need. I set my heart on a BMW 3-series coupe.

What a revelation. I started driving out to a local watersports lake just outside the centre of Reading where I was living at the time. It was only miles from my house but it was totally inaccessible by public transport and the cost of a taxi would have been prohibitive. Having the car enabled me to participate in a sport that was otherwise closed to me, and through which I met a great new set of friends. The car also made me more valuable at work: with it I could travel to client meetings without the help of a (usually more senior) colleague, which meant that I was let off the leash to handle more client contact on my own. Once I had the car again, giving it up would have meant giving up my major social activity, and becoming reliant on colleagues again at work. There was no going back.

Unfortunately the BMW was neither the cheapest car to run, nor the most environmentally friendly. A few months after moving to Manchester I sold it and bought a rather more eco-friendly turbo diesel.

I can’t imagine not having a car now, especially with the arrival of a baby. I know people can and do manage, but our whole society is built around individual transport to specific destinations. I could say I wish that it weren’t the case, and certainly I would like public transport to provide a more viable alternative. But the honest reality is that I like the freedom and individuality that the car offers. The ability to go exactly where I want in a manner and environment that I have defined.

So does that make me a bad person? I don’t think it does. The things I love about the car do not make it a bad thing. I’m not wedded to the petrol engine: I’d love there to be a real and environmentally friendly alternative. I know a lot of the carbon footprint of a car is laid down in its manufacture rather than its use, but again this is a challenge that can be addressed, if not totally overcome. I don’t think it is the car per se that is the problem: it is just today’s cars.

Likewise I don’t think being a car lover necessarily makes you a planet hater. The environmental impact will always be a factor in my future choice of cars and I think anyone for whom it’s not should rightly be pilloried (that means you in your Chelsea tractor). Wherever it is most practical I will continue to use public transport (I’m sat in Euston station typing this).

But I will continue to love cars, and I confess, will dream of driving a V8 monster when I’m chugging along in my somewhat more eco-friendly diesel.